I n M a t e r i a d i D i r i t t o d i C a n n a b i s in Italy it seems that the incongruity and absurdity of certain judgments of appeal and first instance depend on the schizophrenia of the highest degree of judgment:

THE POINT OF LAW

Taking up an interesting reflection of the lawyer ZAINA, Here are two sentences, the first dated 8 April 2014, n.33835, and the second exactly two days after, n.16019, claiming two opposing principles. Of these two principles, we will not occur degrees to recognize that apparently incorrect, aberrante e, I say we let, “against nature”!

THE FIRST PRINCIPLE: relating to the cultivation of Cannabis, must be ruled out for the punishment of all those activities that they are harmless and do not specifically represent, they give a social, it a risk of harm to any.

THE SECOND PRINCIPLE: conduct is socially offensive and therefore necessarily to prosecute and punish any unauthorized activity of growing cannabis plants.

The behavior can be evaluated as harmless, and then you can rule out the punishment, exclusively when the plant cultivated not possess active (sic!)

We leave it to you “l’arduo” task of discerning right from wrong, water from wine, Nettles jasmine. And ask yourself the simple question: “if a plant is literally their active, when does a plant can have no active ingredient?”

The answer at the next Court of Cassation.

We OnAir, “dream” it's a sensible answer…