Tag Archives,,en,A n c o r a u n a v o l t a was a great #kumbamela of Cannabis,,it,A huge flow of people who,,it,driven by an almost mystical dynamic,,it,it poured into the Pavilions of the Cornella Fair in Barcelona,,it,in Catalonia,,it,animated by a great common force,,it,that of the most amazing plant on the planet,,it,The numbers of what is the leading trade fair in Europe and among the most relevant in the world are always impressive,,it,on an area of ​​approx,,it,m2 more than,,it,visitors per day and almost,,it,local and international companies active in the cannabis industry,,it,But what is striking about this Fifteenth Edition is the perfect syntonic fusion that has been created over time between the City of Barcelona,,it: in Italy

Secret Cup>*Napoli*15|feb|15

Secret Cup 2015

Cover

-The SECRET CUP is a moment of COMPARISON between lovers cultivation-

The spirit of the initiative aims to generate, through a free exchange of information, practices and to know, a formative value collective and common growth.

There is a Antiprohibitionism facade

A '”activism easy ", rosewater, done for trend, for fashion or, worse, for personal convenience. It 'a kind of commitment that this usually ends when begins the daily necessitiesty to get to the bottom, to put your heart, to go beyond the narrow limits of his own brain & the own backyard

-The SECRET CUP NOT ALL THIS-

Secret Cup
And it is with that DEEP PRIDE CANNABICO
OnAir -Visioni&Revolutions x Rebuild the Planet- Exclusive Media Sponsor dell’Evento,
NE ANNOUNCES THE CONDUCT for the next month of FEBRUARY in Naples::::::::::::::::::::::: >*

DO NOT MISS, if you can

Secret Cup ita

legislation

I n M a t e RivoluzioneDiOgnuor i a d i D i r i t t o d i C a n n a b i s in Italy it seems that the incongruity and absurdity of certain judgments of appeal and first instance depend on the schizophrenia of the highest degree of judgment:

THE POINT OF LAW

Taking up an interesting reflection of the lawyer ZAINA, Here are two sentences, the first dated 8 April 2014, n.33835, and the second exactly two days after, n.16019, claiming two opposing principles. Of these two principles, we will not occur degrees to recognize that apparently incorrect, aberrante e, I say we let, “against nature”!

THE FIRST PRINCIPLE: relating to the cultivation of Cannabis, must be ruled out for the punishment of all those activities that they are harmless and do not specifically represent, they give a social, it a risk of harm to any.

THE SECOND PRINCIPLE: conduct is socially offensive and therefore necessarily to prosecute and punish any unauthorized activity of growing cannabis plants.

The behavior can be evaluated as harmless, and then you can rule out the punishment, exclusively when the plant cultivated not possess active (sic!)

We leave it to you “l’arduo” task of discerning right from wrong, water from wine, Nettles jasmine. And ask yourself the simple question: “if a plant is literally their active, when does a plant can have no active ingredient?”

The answer at the next Court of Cassation.

We OnAir, “dream” it's a sensible answer…