Tag Archives,,en,A n c o r a u n a v o l t a was a great #kumbamela of Cannabis,,it,A huge flow of people who,,it,driven by an almost mystical dynamic,,it,it poured into the Pavilions of the Cornella Fair in Barcelona,,it,in Catalonia,,it,animated by a great common force,,it,that of the most amazing plant on the planet,,it,The numbers of what is the leading trade fair in Europe and among the most relevant in the world are always impressive,,it,on an area of ​​approx,,it,m2 more than,,it,visitors per day and almost,,it,local and international companies active in the cannabis industry,,it,But what is striking about this Fifteenth Edition is the perfect syntonic fusion that has been created over time between the City of Barcelona,,it: antiprohibitionism

Press release for the presentation of> * OnAir Magazine

onair

Press release

Editorial OnAir Magazine

 

In view of the imminent release of N. 0/1 OnAir Visions&Revolutions, the new quarterly

Regeneration Eco-Syntonics, scheduled for the end of October 2014, with formal presentations in

program in Palermo 25 October 2014 at the Teatro Garibaldi Kalsa and Rome in November 2014 (location to be defined), publish the press release from the Editors, that anticipates part of the contents of the magazine at the service of the battle for the legalization of Hemp / Cannabis:

Press release OnAir

legislation

I n M a t e RivoluzioneDiOgnuor i a d i D i r i t t o d i C a n n a b i s in Italy it seems that the incongruity and absurdity of certain judgments of appeal and first instance depend on the schizophrenia of the highest degree of judgment:

THE POINT OF LAW

Taking up an interesting reflection of the lawyer ZAINA, Here are two sentences, the first dated 8 April 2014, n.33835, and the second exactly two days after, n.16019, claiming two opposing principles. Of these two principles, we will not occur degrees to recognize that apparently incorrect, aberrante e, I say we let, “against nature”!

THE FIRST PRINCIPLE: relating to the cultivation of Cannabis, must be ruled out for the punishment of all those activities that they are harmless and do not specifically represent, they give a social, it a risk of harm to any.

THE SECOND PRINCIPLE: conduct is socially offensive and therefore necessarily to prosecute and punish any unauthorized activity of growing cannabis plants.

The behavior can be evaluated as harmless, and then you can rule out the punishment, exclusively when the plant cultivated not possess active (sic!)

We leave it to you “l’arduo” task of discerning right from wrong, water from wine, Nettles jasmine. And ask yourself the simple question: “if a plant is literally their active, when does a plant can have no active ingredient?”

The answer at the next Court of Cassation.

We OnAir, “dream” it's a sensible answer…